Here is a nice graph of the current Bitcoin blockchain. I didn’t think it was too bad, but the one key difference here is that for the payment channels with penalties as currently designed, it’s necessitating that you store these secret nonces forever until channel close. Mike Schmidt: Murch or t-bast, any other comments on taproot and MuSig2 channels? ● Ledger Live supports taproot: Ledger’s client software, Ledger Live, announced taproot support in their v2.35.0 release as an experimental feature. ● Is there something about Bitcoin that prevents implementing the same privacy protocols of Monero and Zcash? This leaves users of segwit without the same level of message signing support available to users of legacy addresses, and it may represent a reason some users are unwilling to move to segwit addresses. 14708 prints a warning when unrecognized section names are used in the bitcoin.conf configuration file. Bastien Teinturier: So basically jamming, there are two types of jamming, slow jamming and fast jamming, and those two types of jamming potentially and most likely need two different kinds of solutions. Bastien Teinturier: Sure. So right now, when we announced the channel on the network, we explicitly announced node IDs and the Bitcoin keys that are inside the multisig 2-of-2, and people verified that the output that we are referencing is actually locked with the script hash of multisig 2-of-2 of those two keys, so you can only use it with scripts that really follow the format of Lightning channels without taproot.
If miners don’t lock in taproot by the end of the three month signaling period, a separate attempt to activate it using another mechanism is expected to be tried. Bastien Teinturier: Yeah, I think also one of the reasons we don’t see pinning is that really, it’s harder to pin right now and make it work your while, because right now, commitment transactions do pay some fees. Mark Erhardt: Yeah, with the simple variant where you do two or three times more, wouldn’t that be sort of a jamming vector? By breaking the $10,000 mark the value of Bitcoin increased tenfold since the beginning of the year. The cryptocurrency started the year at $6,965.72. In 2015, prices started at $314 and rose to $434 for the year. The market cap of Bitcoin was around $515bn, with Bitcoin’s dominance rising to 46.69%. However, its volume stood at $11.85bn, which fell 31.34% in the last 24 hours. Bitcoin’s price remains near the $31,000 level, as bullish investors wait for further upward movement. I propose some updates, then it’s your time to propose some updates, then it’s my time, so that it’s not as efficient in terms of latency, because if you want to propose an update and it’s not your turn to propose them, you’ll have to wait for a bit.
And we’ve always gone back and forth between those, because we don’t know if we should do a simpler version first and wait for later to do a much more complex version, or if we should just jump to the more complex version right now. And we’ve simplified commitments. So, those are things that we’ve always been just hand-wavy about how we would do that in the future. But I think this is still very far away in the future. Still others, such as the United States, are examining how they might regulate cryptocurrency more effectively. But what’s interesting is that once we start having ideas, concrete ideas on how to do that local reputation, we can actually deploy it on our node in a shadow mode, where you will still relay all the HTLCs, but you will keep track of the reputation, and you will record the decision you would have made if we would have activated that code. Again, this is not a reputation system where nodes share reputations between each other and gossip about it, where we have to be worried about someone bad-mouthing another node or 바이낸스 KYC 인증 (estesparkrentals.com) anything like that. You have more risk that one of those shards will not get to the recipient because there’s a buggy node somewhere in the middle.
And if mempool stays full with a very high feerate for a few months, then there’s an incentive to start attacking, and I think we should be ready for that before it happens. If you solve the fee problem, you make the mining incentive problem worse. This is the cancellation problem. This is not so much a problem anymore in Bitcoin as we hopefully soon have Segregated Witness plus a low s policy that prevents the known malleability of ECDSA. And for this, one of the promising solutions is to use local reputation, where you track how much fee revenue every one of your peers has generated for you in the past, and you only allocate them liquidity bandwidth for something that would lose less than what they made you earn in the past basically. But actually, I think that at that point, latency shouldn’t be that much of an issue, but that’s something that we’ll see once we actually have implemented it and have some figures running on the real network. While I do not fully agree with him on every point, I think he perfectly lays out the skeptic’s argument to NFTs (as we saw them used at the time.